First-Principles
AI Education

Structured programs for leadership, architects, and engineers — built on foundational understanding, not tool dependency.

L1  StrategicL2  ArchitectureL3  Technical

The AI Competency Crisis

Most organizations have adopted AI tools. Very few understand what those tools actually do, why they work, or when they fail. This gap between adoption and comprehension represents the single largest unmanaged risk in enterprise technology today.

Tool-based training teaches people to operate interfaces. First-principles education teaches people to reason about systems. The difference determines whether your organization can evaluate AI capabilities independently, or whether it remains permanently dependent on vendor narratives.

87%

Tool-Trained, Not Fluent

Of enterprise teams that have completed AI training programs, the majority can operate a specific tool but cannot evaluate alternative approaches or diagnose failures independently.

Higher Vendor Lock-in

Organizations with tool-dependent training are four times more likely to accept vendor cost increases without evaluating alternatives.

$2.4M

Average Misallocation

Enterprise AI budgets misallocated annually due to technical leadership that cannot independently evaluate model capabilities or total cost of ownership.

18 mo.

Tool Obsolescence Cycle

Average lifespan of an AI platform interface before significant change. First-principles knowledge remains relevant for decades.

First Principles, Not Tutorials

Our programs are built on a single conviction: understanding precedes capability. Every module is designed to build structural comprehension — the kind of knowledge that survives platform changes, model generations, and industry shifts.

We do not teach tools. We teach the reasoning that makes all tools intelligible. When a participant completes our program, they understand why a system works, where it will fail, and what alternatives exist.

Mathematical Foundations

Linear algebra, probability, optimization — not as academic exercises, but as the operational substrate of every AI system.

Architectural Reasoning

How transformer architectures work. Why attention mechanisms scale. What retrieval-augmented generation actually does to inference quality.

Failure Mode Analysis

Hallucination, mode collapse, distribution shift, prompt injection. Every AI failure mode is a consequence of architectural properties.

Vendor Independence

When your teams understand fundamentals, they can evaluate any platform, any model, any vendor claim against first principles.

Design Principle

Each layer is independently valuable. Any participant can enter at the layer appropriate to their role without prerequisites from lower layers. But every layer is built on the same foundational framework — ensuring consistent vocabulary, mental models, and decision-making criteria across the organization.

What This Program Is Not

Clarity requires boundaries. The most important thing we can tell you about this program is what it deliberately excludes — and why those exclusions make it more valuable, not less.

This Is Not

A tool-specific certification that becomes obsolete when the UI changes
A vendor marketing exercise disguised as education
A prompt engineering workshop focused on a single platform
An executive overview with slide decks and no technical depth
A coding bootcamp that substitutes pattern-matching for comprehension
A theoretical lecture series disconnected from operational reality
A one-size-fits-all course that treats CIOs and engineers identically

This Is

First-principles education that remains relevant across model generations
Vendor-neutral, framework-agnostic — built on mathematics and architecture
Structured reasoning about AI systems — why they work, how they fail
Technically grounded at every level — leadership receives substance, not summaries
Engineering-grade understanding that enables independent evaluation
Connected to operational deployment — theory mapped to system design decisions
Layered by role — same foundational framework, depth calibrated to function

The test is simple: If a tool changes its interface tomorrow, does your team's knowledge still hold? If a new model architecture emerges next quarter, can your architects evaluate it independently? First-principles education answers both with confidence.

L1CIOs, VPs, Senior Leadership

Strategic AI Comprehension

Leadership does not need to write code. But leadership does need to understand AI at a systems level — well enough to evaluate vendor claims, approve architecture decisions, assess risk, and govern AI deployments with genuine technical confidence.

01

AI as Systems Engineering

What AI systems actually are: statistical models, not intelligence. How inference works. What training means. Why "accuracy" is misleading without context on precision, recall, and distribution.

02

Risk Architecture

Hallucination as a structural property. Data sovereignty as a compliance requirement. Model drift and its operational consequences.

03

Economic Models of AI

Token economics versus infrastructure ownership. TCO analysis for public API vs. private deployment. Budget governance for AI programs.

04

Governance & Accountability

Model versioning and audit trails. Explainability requirements by regulatory context. Board-level AI reporting frameworks.

05

Vendor Evaluation Frameworks

Independent evaluation criteria for model performance, data handling practices, lock-in risk, and total cost of ownership.

Outcome

Participants leave with the vocabulary, mental models, and evaluation frameworks to make AI decisions at the strategic level — without dependence on vendors or technical intermediaries.

L2Technical Leaders, Architects, Engineering Managers

AI System Architecture & Decision Frameworks

The architect's challenge is not understanding AI in isolation — it is understanding how AI integrates into production systems with existing security, data, and operational constraints.

01

Transformer Architecture Deep Dive

Attention mechanisms, positional encoding, multi-head attention — explained as system design patterns.

02

Model Selection & Sizing

8B vs. 70B vs. 180B parameter models: capability boundaries, inference costs, hardware requirements. Open-weight vs. proprietary trade-offs.

03

RAG & Retrieval Systems

Vector databases, embedding models, chunking strategies, relevance scoring. When RAG improves quality and when it introduces latency without value.

04

Inference Infrastructure

GPU compute planning, quantization strategies (GGUF, GPTQ, AWQ), inference servers (vLLM, TGI), throughput optimization.

05

Agentic Systems Design

Multi-step AI workflows: tool use, function calling, chain-of-thought orchestration. Safety boundaries for autonomous AI actions.

06

Security & Data Architecture

Prompt injection, data poisoning, model extraction. Designing data pipelines that maintain sovereignty through the AI inference lifecycle.

Outcome

Participants gain system-level reasoning to design AI architectures that meet production requirements — selecting models, planning infrastructure, and maintaining security without vendor guidance.

L3Engineers, Data Scientists, CS Graduates

Technical Foundations & Implementation

This is where mathematics meets implementation. Layer 3 does not assume prior ML experience, but it does assume engineering aptitude. Participants build understanding from the mathematical substrate upward.

01

Mathematical Foundations

Linear algebra for embeddings. Probability theory for generative models. Calculus for optimization. Information theory for loss functions.

02

Neural Network Architecture

Forward propagation, backpropagation, gradient descent, learning rate scheduling. Why networks converge and when they don't.

03

Language Model Internals

Tokenization, embedding spaces, attention computation, next-token prediction. Temperature, top-k, and top-p at the distribution level.

04

Fine-Tuning & Adaptation

Full fine-tuning vs. LoRA vs. QLoRA. RLHF and DPO alignment techniques. When fine-tuning improves task performance vs. prompt engineering.

05

Evaluation & Benchmarking

BLEU, ROUGE, perplexity — and why they often mislead. Designing task-specific evaluation frameworks. Human evaluation protocols.

06

Production Engineering

Model serving, API design, caching strategies, monitoring. MLOps principles without vendor lock-in. Version control for models and data.

Outcome

First-principles comprehension of neural network architecture, language model mechanics, fine-tuning methodology, and production deployment — validated through practical assessment.

Curriculum Architecture

Twelve modules, three layers. Each module is self-contained but designed to compound with others. Organizations can deploy the full program or select modules by role and priority.

#ModuleLayerDuration
01AI as Systems Engineering — What AI Is and Isn'tL1Half-day
02Risk, Governance & Regulatory LandscapeL1Half-day
03AI Economics — TCO, Token Costs & Build vs. BuyL1Half-day
04Transformer Architecture & Attention MechanismsL2Full day
05Model Selection, Sizing & Open-Weight LandscapeL2Full day
06RAG, Retrieval Systems & Vector ArchitectureL2Full day
07Agentic Systems & Multi-Step OrchestrationL2Full day
08Mathematical Foundations for AIL32 days
09Neural Networks — From First PrinciplesL32 days
10Language Model Internals & GenerationL32 days
11Fine-Tuning, Alignment & AdaptationL32 days
12Production Engineering & MLOpsL32 days
3
L1 Modules
1.5 days total
4
L2 Modules
4 days total
5
L3 Modules
10 days total

Delivery Formats

Three formats, calibrated by audience and depth. Each is independently deployable. Organizations typically begin with Leadership Briefings, then extend to Technical Workshops and Certification Programs.

Leadership Briefings

Layer 1 · Strategic

Half-day executive sessions. Dense, structured, technically grounded. Calibrated for time-constrained senior leaders.

Audience: CIOs, CTOs, VPs of Engineering, Board-level technology advisors, AI program sponsors.

Outcome: Technical vocabulary, systems-level mental models, risk evaluation frameworks, vendor assessment criteria.

3 × half-day sessions | 8–15 participants | In-person or virtual

Technical Workshops

Layer 2 · Architecture

Full-day intensive workshops. Hands-on architecture exercises, model evaluation labs, system design reviews.

Audience: Solution architects, engineering managers, senior developers, DevOps/MLOps leads, technical product managers.

Outcome: Ability to design AI system architectures, evaluate model trade-offs, and make build-vs-buy decisions grounded in technical analysis.

4 × full-day sessions | 10–20 participants | In-person preferred

Certification Programs

Layer 3 · Technical

Multi-day deep programs with assessment. Mathematical foundations, implementation exercises, capstone projects.

Audience: Software engineers, ML engineers, data scientists, CS graduates, technical professionals transitioning to AI.

Outcome: First-principles comprehension validated through practical assessment, not multiple-choice exams.

10 days (modular) | 12–24 participants | In-person + lab environment

Available Programs

Browse and enroll in currently available programs. Filter by category or level to find the right fit for your role and experience.

0 programs

Understanding Precedes Capability.

AI fluency is not a training exercise. It is the foundation on which every informed decision, every sound architecture, and every responsible deployment is built.

education@alcomtechnologies.com

enterprise@alcomtechnologies.com